Majority of creative graduates 'in work and happy'
Share
The majority of graduates from creative courses work in the creative industries and are satisfied with their jobs, according to new research.
The Creative Graduates, Creative Futures survey - conducted by the Institute for Employment Studies - quizzed more than 3500 graduates from creative courses across the UK.
It found that 78 per cent of those surveyed were working in the creative industries, while 77 per cent said they were satisfied with their work.
This compares to a national average of 44 per cent job satisfaction, according to a 2009 survey by employment consultancy SHL Global.
However, the latest research showed that only 48 per cent of graduates were earning more than £20 000 a year, and 33 per cent were earning £15 000 or less.
It also revealed that design is the most common employment sector, with 28 per cent of graduates surveyed working in the design industry.
In addition, the research discovered that 48 per cent of graduates were engaged in ‘portfolio working’ - typically combining paid employment with self-employment or working voluntarily - while 79 per cent of employed graduates are working part-time in at least one of their jobs.
The survey showed that 45 per cent of graduates work or have worked on a freelance basis, and 42 per cent have undertaken voluntary work - including unpaid internships - since graduation.
The study was conducted by the IES, a partnership of 26 UK higher education institutions, and the Council for Higher Education in Art and Design. The project is based at and supported by the University of the Arts London.
The respondents were quizzed between September and December 2008, and asked about their working lives up to six years after gaining their first degrees.
A second stage of research was conducted in September 2009, examining graduates’ career paths and their experiences of work in the recession. These results will be published in the spring.
Writing in the foreword to the study, Will Hutton, executive vice-chairman of The Work Foundation, says, ‘What the report captures is the vigorous, if risky, world of creativity and those dedicated to work in it.’
He adds, ‘They report great job satisfaction. However, they are desperately low-paid. Many found the only entry into the industry was via unpaid internships, requiring parental support and middle-class backgrounds. The relationship is close to exploitative, even though the young men and women trying to win a foothold in the industry do not see it that way.’
Elizabeth Rouse, pro-rector of the University of the Arts London and chairwoman of the project steering group, says, ‘We in art and education need to understand more about graduates’ contribution to the success of the UK’s creative economy, how career patterns are changing, and what skills and attributes graduates need to be successful.’
Further results from the survey
- 18% of creative graduates said they were employed in a non-creative job
- 23% of respondents were self-employed or undertaking freelance work, and 18% were running a business
- 33% of respondents had experience of teaching
View results 10 per page | 20 per page
Readers' comments (14)
Anonymous | Wed, 20 Jan 2010 1:22 pm
I would say a good 70% of the Industrial design graduates from my university are still looking for work two years after graduation.... This makes me a little skeptical of these figures.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Roy Wylam | Wed, 20 Jan 2010 1:44 pm
What this survey has missed out is the cold hard fact that 10,000 new designers graduate every year this has been going on since the early nineties previous to this it was 30,000, that makes a conservative estimate of at least 200000 new designers in the UK in the last twenty years.
At the turn of the century there was approximately 5000 design groups in the UK, now there are over 15000, what this says is, if you cant get a job you set up on your own.
I know of many superb designers over the years who have given up designing for the simple reason it is so low paid for the amount of skilled work and training required. This is hardly surprising as with this massive oversupply of designers the market forces of supply and demand come into play.
This survey is a farce conducted by people who have no idea what their talking about, in fact it is beyond a farce it is outrages that money was even spent on it.
As far as I know design courses never layout the true statistics of what is really going on in the design world. The core problem of giving false hope of a design job to design graduates has not been addressed and this is fundamentally wrong.
And all this 'survey' does is reinforce a rose tinted view of the design world. Elizabeth Rouse should be ashamed of herself.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Patrick Goff | Wed, 20 Jan 2010 1:50 pm
I don't believe these figures - or at least what were their prameters?
For the first time since we started the jobs columns on our site at www.hotedelsigns.net we have no posts for interior designers. Hundreds were made redundant last year.
Also last survey I saw showed 40% of fine art graduates as 'untraceable' - so how are they defining the creative industries? Do they include fine art, ceramics, theatre, carpet design etc? Or just graduates from Univ ofthe Arts Graphics courses?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
kat | Wed, 20 Jan 2010 2:52 pm
If there is a fear of saturation in the market, it would make sense for the colleges to hold up on the numbers they accept each year. It would also bring the quality up in the graduates. There are many ways to make your way in design/art/print other than the colleges - what happened to apprenticeships? A pretty much guarantee of a practical job and training all bundled into one.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Jonathan Baldwin | Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:55 am
I think the critics above are missing some important points.
Firstly, a design graduate is not only capable of working as a designer, but as a graduate. The number of design jobs has the same relationship to the number of design graduates in the same way that the number of jobs as an historian has a relationship to the number of history graduates. In other words, none.
When you say "10,000 new designers graduate each year" what you mean is "10,000 people graduate from design courses each year" - you're the one predetermining what they're capable of, and being pretty limited at that. A design graduate, if you read the report (I doubt you have) is capable of so many more things than only being a designer.
Second point - those who say "these people don't know what they're talking about" - well I know one of the authors and looked through the report the other day and believe me, they do. This is good, thorough research, not a puff piece. It raises lots of important questions for design educators and employers - and not just those in the design industry. Read it before you criticise.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:03 am
I graduated last year from a creative course and nearly all of the people on my course have gone straight into teaching is this considered a creative industry? I have been looking since graduation for work in any creative industry and had no luck, I am still in the same job I had before and during uni which has nothing to do the creative industry.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Roy Wylam | Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:55 am
In reply to Jonathan Baldwin first point, I would like to say that if you ask design students the question do they want a design job when they graduate, I bet the answer from 90% of them is yes.
On his second point I was talking to the head of the University College for the Creative Arts at Farnham, who specifically told me that 33% of graduates found a design job in the first two years and that this figure is from a tracking study they undertake (which they are required to do) and these figures were used to send back to the Department for Education to justify the continued existence of their design course, 30% being the number required for continuation.
This report smacks of the same thing.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:51 pm
I find it incredible that no one has mentioned the fact that graduates will face a year of potentially working for free as an Intern, this is a reason alone why hardly anyone is going into design jobs after finishing Uni, because it makes no financial sense.
Studios think its acceptable to do this, and think that they are doing graduates a favour but I think that they are taking young designers for a ride,especially if the placement is for periods of 3-6months +, they are already broke as it is from student loans and I find this far from fair, especially as there usually is no position to potentially be offered afterwards.
I would like to see a new system and guidelines for recruiting interns, potentially headed by the Design Council or some one like that, to protect young designers, keep studios in line with what they can do, i.e. minimum wage should be an absolute standard with placements over say 2 months, and credit must be given where credit is due for work.
I graduated 2 Years ago, and as far as I'm aware, only 10% of my coursemates have design jobs, I have struggled to find anything in my vicinity and have had to look for jobs in other fields, and try and secure freelance work on top of working a full time job.
Universities need to help the graduates more though, there is little to no interaction as to what they can expect in the future and no help after graduation.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Elizabeth Rouse | Thu, 21 Jan 2010 1:40 pm
I would like to point out to Roy Wylam that the survey was conducted by an independent organization the Institute of Employment Studies
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Roy Wylam | Thu, 21 Jan 2010 4:51 pm
Well Elizabeth Rouse is that all you can point out, most of the comments on this page back up what I have been saying.
And the designers I have meet over the years say the same thing.
This Institute of Employment Studies are obversely not up to the job.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment