Who heads the client’s chain of command?

Congratulations to Vicky Sargent for her article on the changing nature of client/designer relationships – Chains of command (DW 27 January).

But only towards the end did the true cause of that change emerge – the need for design to be accountable.

“Evolutionary” design and more devolved identity management systems are trends in the industry, not panaceas for success. They are simply a means to an end: of ensuring that all client communications are driven by one thing – the needs of their audience groups (and, yes, that does include staff as a target group).

It’s the fundamental nature of all business; and how successful product brand management has been defined for years.

Effective corporate brand management requires a greater emphasis on strategy formulation, in order to set criteria against which work can be measured; in turn, this must reflect a detailed understanding of who the corporate brand is targeted at, and of audience perceptions and needs.

lt also requires a different approach to that of the tradiitional identity programme, with emphasis on the provision of broader communications advice. Inevitably, this requires greater flexibility and “breadth and depth” in the client/consultant relationship).

Do that, and we’ll not only solve our clients’ communications problems, but perhaps some of our industry’s, too. Might the article have been sub-headed “Someone else in command”?

David Rowson

Managing Director

Luxon Carrá Limited

Corporate Brand Management

London SWl

Latest articles

Design Week Awards 2021 opens for entries

This year winning work will be given a bigger platform that ever before, we are assembling our biggest ever judging panel and categories have been tweaked for maximum relevance.