What’s Ћ point?

The English language (and the Latin alphabet it uses) is well known for adapting itself with the times and the needs of the many different people who use it. Because the language and the writing system have changed so much already, someone or another regularly comes along with a new pitch for yet another change. But is it a great idea or just a gimmick to propose something new when we’ve already got the building blocks?

The

Recently Paul Mathis, an Australian restaurateur, has decided to ‘improve efficiency’ by shortening the word ‘the’ to a letter ‘Ћ’, which is designed to look like a combination of the letters ‘T’ and ‘h’. Mathis seems baffled that ‘and’ can be abbreviated with an ampersand while being only the fifth most commonly used word in English, while the most commonly used word still requires THREE WHOLE LETTERS! His pitch is that his new character could save valuable strokes of the pen or valuable characters in a tweet. Maybe so, but is his the right solution?

If you look at Ћ in just about any typeface, you can see that it’s already got better proportions than just a T and an h crammed together. But although Mathis proposes this as a new shape, in fact just writing about it requires an existing solution (and probably not the best): the Cyrillic capital letter ‘Tshe’, used for Serbian. What troubles is that saying Ћ can replace ‘the’ would be awkward for people who already know the Cyrillic alphabet and the sounds its letters can make.

Besides, the Latin alphabet already has a Unicode-ready single character that makes the right sound, and it comes in both upper- and lowercase: the thorn! Used mostly in Icelandic today, Þ and þ are used for the ‘th’ sound of ’the’. The eth (Ð and ð) might work a little better linguistically, but thorn also has history on its side. That quaint ‘Ye Olde’ tavern you like? That comes from an older way of writing thorn that looked more like a ‘y’.

These gimmicks occasionally gain some ground, though. Martin Speckter invented the interrobang — ‽ — in 1962 and it finally made its way into the Unicode standard, although you’d be hard-pressed to find it in general use. You may also have seen talk of the SarcMark – which someone suggested could be used to denote sarcasm to avoid any awkward misinterpretations during text or email conversations – however that idea didn’t really take off either.

The ampersand grew out of writing convention, and eventually took on a slightly subtler meaning than just any instance of ‘and’. That kind of evolution is how these concepts take root. Mathis’s gimmick is more of a limp stab at a revolution, and probably one we should dismiss. Þ end.

Dan Rhatigan is type director at Monotype.

Hide Comments (3)Show Comments (3)
Comments
  • Jonathan Howells November 30, -0001 at 12:00 am

    Um… I proposed this very same idea, as an April Fools Joke back in 2009, with a very similar execution and mock justification.

    See my blog post below. I even called it “tache” and this guy is calling his “Tshe”….Just sayin’

    http://graphicdefiner.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/obama-proposes-new-letter-to-our-alphabet/

  • Tim November 30, -0001 at 12:00 am

    The ampersand is actually a graphic representation of the French ‘et’.. It isn’t a short form of ‘and’.

  • Alexei Vanyashin November 30, -0001 at 12:00 am

    If you look at ? in just about any typeface, you can see that it’s already got better proportions than just a T and an h crammed together.

    Serbian ? is composed of T and the ?-Cyrillic(upside-down) which makes it different in proportions from T+h.

  • Post a comment

Latest articles

Design Manchester 2017 announces line-up

The annual design festival is back for its fifth edition this October, and will feature Pentagram partner Naresh Ramchandani, Buzzcocks’ record sleeve designer Malcolm Garrett and an exhibition on Lucienne